前言
在高並發場景下System.currentTimeMillis()並發問題嚴重,甚至比創建一個普通對象要耗時的多;在系統中有時候不可避免要打印一些時間戳,但怎么做才更好呢。
代碼實現
iimport java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.ScheduledExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLong;
/** * 高並發場景下System.currentTimeMillis()的性能問題的優化 * 時間戳打印建議使用 */
public class SystemClock {
private static final String THREAD_NAME = "system.clock";
private static final SystemClock MILLIS_CLOCK = new SystemClock(1);
private final long precision;
private final AtomicLong now;
private SystemClock(long precision) {
this.precision = precision;
now = new AtomicLong(System.currentTimeMillis());
scheduleClockUpdating();
}
public static SystemClock millisClock() {
return MILLIS_CLOCK;
}
private void scheduleClockUpdating() {
ScheduledExecutorService scheduler = Executors.newSingleThreadScheduledExecutor(runnable -> {
Thread thread = new Thread(runnable, THREAD_NAME);
thread.setDaemon(true);
return thread;
});
scheduler.scheduleAtFixedRate(() ->
now.set(System.currentTimeMillis()), precision, precision, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
}
public long now() {
return now.get();
}
}
調用示例
Long start = SystemClock.millisClock().now()
測試對比
public static void main(String[] args) {
int times=Integer.MAX_VALUE;
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (long i = 0; i < times; i++) {
SystemClock.millisClock().now();
}
long end = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("SystemClock Time:" + (end - start) + "毫秒");
long start2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
for (long i = 0; i < times; i++) {
System.currentTimeMillis();
}
long end2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println("SystemCurrentTimeMillis Time:" + (end2 - start2) + "毫秒");
}
輸出結果是:
SystemClock Time:2741毫秒
SystemCurrentTimeMillis Time:14072毫秒
五倍的效率
細節決定成敗,敬畏每一行代碼,代碼優化永無止境!