今天閑來無事,突然想測試一下C#,C++,Java這三種我比較常用的語言在浮點數運算方面的效率,大家可以先不急往下看,猜想一下結果如何。
首先是算法,采用計算一個100*100的Mandelbrot set,連續調用1000次來進行計時,算法來自於:
http://www.nicholson.com/rhn/jsbench2.html,一個Javascript引擎的Benchmark(這里再表揚下V8,不愧是最快的JS Engine,跑這個Benchmark,1.023秒,IE10還是有長進,1.163秒,差距不大,但是IE9,9秒......)。
OK,回歸到正題,下面是測試所用的代碼:
先是王者C語言:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <time.h>
int qset(float xx,float yy,float u,float v){
int n;
float t,xsqr,ysqr;
int lim = 100;
float x = xx;
float y = yy;
xsqr = x*x;
ysqr = y*y;
for(n = 0;(n < lim) && (xsqr + ysqr < 4.0);n++){
t = xsqr - ysqr + u;
y = 2.0 * x * y +v;
x = t;
xsqr = t * t;
ysqr = y * y;
}
return n;
}
int mb100(){
int dots = 0;
int res = 100;
float a1 = -2.50;
float b1 = -1.75;
float s = 3.05;
float x = 0;
float y = 0;
float g = s / res;
int i,j,k;
float a,b;
for(j = 0,b = b1;j <res; b += g,j++){
for(i = 0,a = a1;i < res;a += g,i++){
k = qset(x,y,a,b);
if(k > 90) {
dots++;
}
}
}
return dots;
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
clock_t start,finish;
start=clock();
for(int i=0;i<1000;i++){
mb100();
}
finish=clock();
long duration=finish-start;
printf("%ld",duration);//1810 ms
getchar();
return 0;
}
再來是最受歡迎的JAVA:
public class Main {
public static void main(String args[]) throws Exception{
long start=System.currentTimeMillis();
for(int i=0;i<1000;i++){
mb100();
}
long finish=System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println(finish-start); //865ms
}
static int qset(float xx, float yy, float u, float v){
int n;
float t, xsqr, ysqr;
int lim = 100;
float x = xx;
float y = yy;
xsqr = x * x;
ysqr = y * y;
for (n = 0; (n < lim) && (xsqr + ysqr < 4.0); n++)
{
t = xsqr - ysqr + u;
y = 2.0f * x * y + v;
x = t;
xsqr = t * t;
ysqr = y * y;
}
return n;
}
static int mb100(){
int dots = 0;
int res = 100;
float a1 = -2.50f;
float b1 = -1.75f;
float s = 3.05f;
float x = 0;
float y = 0;
float g = s / res;
int i, j, k;
float a, b;
for (j = 0, b = b1; j < res; b += g, j++)
{
for (i = 0, a = a1; i < res; a += g, i++)
{
k = qset(x, y, a, b);
if (k > 90)
{
dots++;
}
}
}
return dots;
}
}
最后是開發效率最高的C#
#region 引用
using System;
using System.Diagnostics;
#endregion
namespace MBTest
{
internal class Program
{
private static void Main(string[] args)
{
Stopwatch watch = new Stopwatch();
watch.Start();
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++)
{
MB100();
}
watch.Stop();
Console.WriteLine(watch.ElapsedMilliseconds);//1810 ms
Console.ReadKey();
}
private static int QSet(float xx, float yy, float u, float v)
{
int n;
float t, xsqr, ysqr;
int lim = 100;
float x = xx;
float y = yy;
xsqr = x*x;
ysqr = y*y;
for (n = 0; (n < lim) && (xsqr + ysqr < 4.0); n++)
{
t = xsqr - ysqr + u;
y = 2.0f*x*y + v;
x = t;
xsqr = t*t;
ysqr = y*y;
}
return n;
}
private static int MB100()
{
int dots = 0;
int res = 100;
float a1 = -2.50f;
float b1 = -1.75f;
float s = 3.05f;
float x = 0;
float y = 0;
float g = s/res;
int i, j, k;
float a, b;
for (j = 0, b = b1; j < res; b += g, j++)
{
for (i = 0, a = a1; i < res; a += g, i++)
{
k = QSet(x, y, a, b);
if (k > 90)
{
dots++;
}
}
}
return dots;
}
}
}
輸出的結果已經注釋在代碼中了,我沒想到的是JAVA居然是最快的,而且還不是快了一星半點兒,只需要C/C#的50%左右,難道是JRE對運算專門做了優化?之前還用過計算SHA-512來進行比較,依然是JAVA最快,不知道是JRE優化還是編譯器優化了,有高手能解釋下么。不過就C和C#來說,運算方面,只要C沒有做過特別優化,效率相差並不大(幾乎相同),但是C語言這種只有高手沒有菜鳥的語言,要想優化的更好,確實比較困難。
