前期數據准備
通過程序往數據庫插入50w數據
-
數據表:
CREATE TABLE `users` (
`id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`time_date` datetime NOT NULL,
`time_timestamp` timestamp NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP ON UPDATE CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
`time_long` bigint(20) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
KEY `time_long` (`time_long`),
KEY `time_timestamp` (`time_timestamp`),
KEY `time_date` (`time_date`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=500003 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1其中time_long、time_timestamp、time_date為同一時間的不同存儲格式
-
實體類users
@Builder
@Data
public class Users {
/**
* 自增唯一id
* */
private Long id;
/**
* date類型的時間
* */
private Date timeDate;
/**
* timestamp類型的時間
* */
private Timestamp timeTimestamp;
/**
* long類型的時間
* */
private long timeLong;
} -
dao層接口
@Mapper
public interface UsersMapper {
@Insert("insert into users(time_date, time_timestamp, time_long) value(#{timeDate}, #{timeTimestamp}, #{timeLong})")
@Options(useGeneratedKeys = true,keyProperty = "id",keyColumn = "id")
int saveUsers(Users users);
} -
測試類往數據庫插入數據
public class UsersMapperTest extends BaseTest {
@Resource
private UsersMapper usersMapper;
@Test
public void test() {
for (int i = 0; i < 500000; i++) {
long time = System.currentTimeMillis();
usersMapper.saveUsers(Users.builder().timeDate(new Date(time)).timeLong(time).timeTimestamp(new Timestamp(time)).build());
}
}
}
sql查詢速率測試
-
通過datetime類型查詢:
select count(*) from users where time_date >="2018-10-21 23:32:44" and time_date <="2018-10-21 23:41:22"
耗時:0.171
-
通過timestamp類型查詢
select count(*) from users where time_timestamp >= "2018-10-21 23:32:44" and time_timestamp <="2018-10-21 23:41:22"
耗時:0.351
-
通過bigint類型查詢
select count(*) from users where time_long >=1540135964091 and time_long <=1540136482372
耗時:0.130s
-
結論 在InnoDB存儲引擎下,通過時間范圍查找,性能bigint > datetime > timestamp
sql分組速率測試
使用bigint 進行分組會每條數據進行一個分組,如果將bigint做一個轉化在去分組就沒有比較的意義了,轉化也是需要時間的
-
通過datetime類型分組:
select time_date, count(*) from users group by time_date
耗時:0.176s
-
通過timestamp類型分組:
select time_timestamp, count(*) from users group by time_timestamp
耗時:0.173s
-
結論 在InnoDB存儲引擎下,通過時間分組,性能timestamp > datetime,但是相差不大
sql排序速率測試
-
通過datetime類型排序:
select * from users order by time_date
耗時:1.038s
-
通過timestamp類型排序
select * from users order by time_timestamp
耗時:0.933s
-
通過bigint類型排序
select * from users order by time_long
耗時:0.775s
-
結論 在InnoDB存儲引擎下,通過時間排序,性能bigint > timestamp > datetime
小結
如果需要對時間字段進行操作(如通過時間范圍查找或者排序等),推薦使用bigint,如果時間字段不需要進行任何操作,推薦使用timestamp,使用4個字節保存比較節省空間,但是只能記錄到2038年記錄的時間有限