最近遇到一個誤更新數據的問題,使用ApexSQL Log做挖掘事務日志的時候,發現ApexSQL Log生成的Redo Script跟原始SQL是有區別的。它們並不是完全一致的。只是邏輯上等價而已。如下所示,我們做一個測試,如下所示,創建一個表后,並模擬忘記添加條件,出現誤刪除數據的情況
SELECT * INTO KERRY_TEST FROM SYS.OBJECTS;
DELETE FROM KERRY_TEST
然后我們用ApexSQL Log挖掘事務日志,你會看到有很多對應的Delete記錄,而且對應的Redo Script跟原始SQL是不一樣的。如下所示,
下面是其中兩個Redo Script(為了方便查看,對腳本進行了格式化)
--DELETE (0003F73C:000065FC:000D) done at 2019-06-13 10:35:56.876 by xxx\xxxx in transaction 0000:0ADF73EA (Committed)
BEGIN TRANSACTION;
DELETE FROM [dbo].[KERRY_TEST]
WHERE /*** WARNING: WHERE CLAUSE FOR THIS STATEMENT WAS GENERATED FOR A TABLE WITH NO PRIMARY KEY AND NO CLUSTERED INDEX ***/
[name] = N'sysfgfrag' COLLATE Chinese_PRC_CI_AS
AND [object_id] = 19
AND [principal_id] IS NULL
AND [schema_id] = 4
AND [parent_object_id] = 0
AND [type] = N'S ' COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS_KS_WS
AND [type_desc] = N'SYSTEM_TABLE' COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS_KS_WS
AND [create_date] = '20160101 10:46:55.060'
AND [modify_date] = '20160101 10:46:55.100'
AND [is_ms_shipped] = 1
AND [is_published] = 0
AND [is_schema_published] = 0;
IF @@ROWCOUNT <= 1
COMMIT TRANSACTION;
ELSE
BEGIN
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION;
PRINT 'ERROR: STATEMENT AFFECTED MORE THAN ONE ROW. ALL THE CHANGES WERE ROLLED BACK.';
END;
--DELETE (0003F73C:000065FC:000A) done at 2019-06-13 10:35:56.876 by xxx\xxx in transaction 0000:0ADF73EA (Committed)
BEGIN TRANSACTION;
DELETE FROM [dbo].[KERRY_TEST]
WHERE /*** WARNING: WHERE CLAUSE FOR THIS STATEMENT WAS GENERATED FOR A TABLE WITH NO PRIMARY KEY AND NO CLUSTERED INDEX ***/
[name] = N'sysseobjvalues' COLLATE Chinese_PRC_CI_AS
AND [object_id] = 9
AND [principal_id] IS NULL
AND [schema_id] = 4
AND [parent_object_id] = 0
AND [type] = N'S ' COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS_KS_WS
AND [type_desc] = N'SYSTEM_TABLE' COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS_KS_WS
AND [create_date] = '20160101 10:47:02.050'
AND [modify_date] = '20160101 10:47:02.057'
AND [is_ms_shipped] = 1
AND [is_published] = 0
AND [is_schema_published] = 0;
IF @@ROWCOUNT <= 1
COMMIT TRANSACTION;
ELSE
BEGIN
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION;
PRINT 'ERROR: STATEMENT AFFECTED MORE THAN ONE ROW. ALL THE CHANGES WERE ROLLED BACK.';
END;
如果有聚集索引,你會看到沒有WHERE條件的UPDATE、DELETE操作都會生成很多個對應的Redo Script,對應的WHERE條件則是聚集索引字段。如下測試所示:
SELECT *
INTO KERRY_TEST2
FROM sys.objects;
CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX PK_KERRY_TEST2 ON KERRY_TEST2(OBJECT_ID);
UPDATE KERRY_TEST2
SET NAME = 'KERRY';
DELETE FROM KERRY_TEST2;
下面是對應的UPDATE、DELETE操作的redo script
--UPDATE (0003F73C:0000700A:001F) done at 2019-06-13 11:27:26.036 by xxx\xxx in transaction 0000:0ADF7404 (Committed)
BEGIN TRANSACTION;
UPDATE [dbo].[KERRY_TEST2]
SET [name] = N'KERRY' COLLATE Chinese_PRC_CI_AS
WHERE [object_id] = 3;
IF @@ROWCOUNT <= 1
COMMIT TRANSACTION;
ELSE
BEGIN
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION;
PRINT 'ERROR: STATEMENT AFFECTED MORE THAN ONE ROW. ALL THE CHANGES WERE ROLLED BACK.';
END;
-- DELETE (0003F73C:00007482:00D9) done at 2019-06-13 11:27:35.406 by xxx\xxx in transaction 0000:0ADF7405 (Committed)
BEGIN TRANSACTION;
DELETE FROM [dbo].[KERRY_TEST2]
WHERE [object_id] = 836302139;
IF @@ROWCOUNT <= 1
COMMIT TRANSACTION;
ELSE
BEGIN
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION;
PRINT 'ERROR: STATEMENT AFFECTED MORE THAN ONE ROW. ALL THE CHANGES WERE ROLLED BACK.';
END;
這里只是簡單記錄一下這個事情,千萬不要以為Redo Script跟原始SQL是完全一致的。如果遇到這種問題,如何判斷呢?可以查看Transaction ID,以及對應的Begin Time , End Time,如下所示,你會發現它們是一致的
![clip_image001[4] clip_image001[4]](/image/aHR0cHM6Ly9pbWcyMDE4LmNuYmxvZ3MuY29tL2Jsb2cvNzM1NDIvMjAxOTA2LzczNTQyLTIwMTkwNjEzMTIxMjQ4Nzk0LTExNTYxMjk4My5wbmc=.png)