Oracle版本:V9.0
當單獨使用order by對數據集進行排序時,SQL如下:
select gend_name,PC_COST03,PC_COST02,pc_start,(case when gend_name is null then PC_COST03 else PC_COST02 end) as pc_cost from pc_mstr left join gend_det on gend_gen = 'PC_MSTR' and pc_part like Trim(gend_option) || '%' and gend_disabled=0 where 1=1 and pc_vend = '715R1736' and pc_part = '7001-32L82F-0U7A1C11' --and rownum = 1 order by pc_start desc
結果:

當rownum和order by一起使用時,SQL入下:
select gend_name,PC_COST03,PC_COST02,pc_start,(case when gend_name is null then PC_COST03 else PC_COST02 end) as pc_cost from pc_mstr left join gend_det on gend_gen = 'PC_MSTR' and pc_part like Trim(gend_option) || '%' and gend_disabled=0 where 1=1 and pc_vend = '715R1736' and pc_part = '7001-32L82F-0U7A1C11' and rownum = 1 order by pc_start desc
結果:

原本以為邏輯沒問題,值應該是130,但執行結果卻是113,經反復推敲,最后得出的結果是,Oracle在執行此語句時,先給了一個記錄給rownum,然后才進行order by,最后才會導致這個結果。因此,考慮到程序在多行數據集中取值時,若無指定取的是某一行,則默認取第一行的值,因此最后的解決辦法是,放棄使用rownum,由程序默認取值進行處理。
最終SQL如下:
select gend_name,PC_COST03,PC_COST02,pc_start,(case when gend_name is null then PC_COST03 else PC_COST02 end) as pc_cost from pc_mstr left join gend_det on gend_gen = 'PC_MSTR' and pc_part like Trim(gend_option) || '%' and gend_disabled=0 where 1=1 and pc_vend = '715R1736' and pc_part = '7001-32L82F-0U7A1C11' order by pc_start desc
