DataGridView的虛擬模式,允許我們在需要時再檢索數據。達到實時加載的目的。這避免了DataGridView由於大數據量而刷新延遲,也避免了數據量過大造成網絡超時,更可以節約本地內存。總之,它的好處多多,但是要實現這種方式,需要做的事情可不是那么簡單,所以需要權衡項目中是否有這樣的大數據。
基本思路就是:
1,本地設立數據的緩存。比如裝載100條數據。
2,如果用戶查閱的數據超過了這個數,就去取下100條數據,並可以考慮丟掉前面的一些緩存,以保證本地內存不會太大。
3,如何判斷是否應該去取數據,DataGridView已經提供了相應的一些事件,如:CellValueNeeded,一般以XXXNeeded的事件就是告訴你需要取數據了。當然,一個重要的前提是要開啟DataGridView的虛擬模式,這些事件才會有效。this.dataGridView1.VirtualMode = true;在這些事件里,我們可以對DataGridView的單元格賦值(就是直接取緩存的數據來顯示,緩存里如果沒有,會自動去取下100條數據)。
4,取下100條數據,可能要涉及到SQL的分頁。比如用top 100 等就可以簡單實現。
下面的例子就是一個緩存的例子,照着MSDN做的,可以做個參考。即使不用於DataGridView,這個緩存的思想也是非常值得借鑒的。
View Code
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Text; using System.Data; using System.Data.SqlClient; namespace DataGridViewVirtualModeTest { interface IDataPageRetriever { DataTable ApplyPageOfData(int lowPageBoundary, int rowsPerPage); } internal class DataRetriever : IDataPageRetriever { private const String Conn_Str = @"Data Source=SK-WZ\SQLEXPRESS;Initial Catalog=TestUse;Persist Security Info=True;User ID=wang;password=wang"; private string tableName; private SqlCommand command; public DataRetriever(string tableName) { this.tableName = tableName; SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection(Conn_Str); conn.Open(); command = conn.CreateCommand(); } private int rowCount = -1; public int RowCount { get { if (rowCount != -1) return RowCount; command.CommandText = "select count(*) from " + tableName; rowCount = (int)command.ExecuteScalar(); return rowCount; } } private DataColumnCollection columns; public DataColumnCollection Columns { get { if (columns != null) return columns; command.CommandText = "select * from " + tableName; SqlDataAdapter adapter = new SqlDataAdapter(); adapter.SelectCommand = command; DataTable table = new DataTable(); table.Locale = System.Globalization.CultureInfo.CurrentCulture; adapter.FillSchema(table, SchemaType.Source); columns = table.Columns; return columns; } } private string commaSeparatedColumnNames; public string CommaSeparatedColumnNames { get { if (commaSeparatedColumnNames != null) return commaSeparatedColumnNames; StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder(); bool isFirstColumn = true; foreach (DataColumn column in Columns) { if (!isFirstColumn) { builder.Append(","); } isFirstColumn = false; builder.Append(column.ColumnName); } commaSeparatedColumnNames = builder.ToString(); return commaSeparatedColumnNames; } } #region IDataPageRetriver private string keyColumnName; public DataTable ApplyPageOfData(int lowPageBoundary, int rowsPerPage) { keyColumnName = Columns[0].ColumnName; StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder(); builder.Append(" select top " + rowsPerPage + " " + CommaSeparatedColumnNames + " from "); builder.Append(tableName); builder.Append(" where " + keyColumnName + " not in ("); builder.Append(" select top " + lowPageBoundary + " " + keyColumnName); builder.Append(" from " + tableName + " order by " + keyColumnName + ") "); builder.Append(" order by " + keyColumnName); command.CommandText = builder.ToString(); SqlDataAdapter adapter = new SqlDataAdapter(); adapter.SelectCommand = command; DataTable table = new DataTable(); adapter.Fill(table); return table; } #endregion } internal class Cache { private struct DataPage { public DataTable table; private int lowIndex; private int highIndex; public DataPage(DataTable table, int rowIndex) { this.table = table; this.lowIndex = MapLowerBoundary(rowIndex); this.highIndex = MapUpperBoundary(rowIndex); } public int LowIndex { get { return this.lowIndex; } } public int HighIndex { get { return this.highIndex; } } public static int MapLowerBoundary(int rowIndex) { return (rowIndex / RowPerPage) * RowPerPage; } public static int MapUpperBoundary(int rowIndex) { return MapLowerBoundary(rowIndex) + RowPerPage - 1; } } IDataPageRetriever dataSupply; static int RowPerPage; DataPage[] catchPages = new DataPage[2]; public Cache(IDataPageRetriever dataSupplier, int rowsPerPage) { this.dataSupply = dataSupplier; RowPerPage = rowsPerPage; PreLoadDataPages(); } private void PreLoadDataPages() { catchPages[0] = new DataPage(dataSupply.ApplyPageOfData(0, RowPerPage), 0); catchPages[1] = new DataPage(dataSupply.ApplyPageOfData(RowPerPage, RowPerPage), RowPerPage); } public string RetrieveElement(int rowIndex, int colIndex) { string element = ""; if (IfPageCatched_TheSetElement(rowIndex, colIndex, ref element)) { return element; } else { element = RetrieveData_CatchIt_ReturnElement(rowIndex, colIndex); } return element; } private bool IfPageCatched_TheSetElement(int rowIndex, int colIndex, ref string element) { if (IsRowCatchedInPage(0, rowIndex)) { element = catchPages[0].table.Rows[rowIndex % RowPerPage][colIndex].ToString(); return true; } else if (IsRowCatchedInPage(1, rowIndex)) { element = catchPages[1].table.Rows[rowIndex % RowPerPage][colIndex].ToString(); return true; } return false; } private string RetrieveData_CatchIt_ReturnElement(int rowIndex, int colIndex) { DataPage newPage = new DataPage(dataSupply.ApplyPageOfData(DataPage.MapLowerBoundary(rowIndex), RowPerPage), rowIndex); //which old datapage should be replaced? catchPages[GetIndexOfReplacedPage(rowIndex)] = newPage; return RetrieveElement(rowIndex, colIndex); } private bool IsRowCatchedInPage(int pageNum, int rowIndex) { return catchPages[pageNum].LowIndex <= rowIndex && catchPages[pageNum].HighIndex >= rowIndex; } private int GetIndexOfReplacedPage(int rowIndex) { if (catchPages[0].HighIndex < rowIndex && catchPages[1].HighIndex < rowIndex) { int offsetFromPage0 = rowIndex - catchPages[0].HighIndex; int offsetFromPage1 = rowIndex - catchPages[1].HighIndex; if (offsetFromPage0 < offsetFromPage1) return 1; else return 0; } else { int offsetFromPage0 = catchPages[0].LowIndex - rowIndex; int offsetFromPage1 = catchPages[1].LowIndex - rowIndex; if (offsetFromPage0 < offsetFromPage1) return 1; return 0; } } } }
DataGridView調用
View Code
using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.ComponentModel; using System.Data; using System.Drawing; using System.Text; using System.Windows.Forms; namespace DataGridViewVirtualModeTest { public partial class Form1 : Form { Cache memoryCache; public Form1() { InitializeComponent(); } private void Form1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { DataRetriever dataSupply = new DataRetriever("t_temp"); memoryCache = new Cache(dataSupply, 50); foreach (DataColumn column in dataSupply.Columns) { this.dataGridView1.Columns.Add(column.ColumnName, column.ColumnName); } this.dataGridView1.RowCount = dataSupply.RowCount; this.dataGridView1.VirtualMode = true; this.dataGridView1.ReadOnly = true; this.dataGridView1.AllowUserToAddRows = false; this.dataGridView1.AllowUserToOrderColumns = false; this.dataGridView1.SelectionMode = DataGridViewSelectionMode.FullRowSelect; this.dataGridView1.CellValueNeeded += new DataGridViewCellValueEventHandler(dataGridView1_CellValueNeeded); this.dataGridView1.AutoSizeColumnsMode = DataGridViewAutoSizeColumnsMode.DisplayedCells; } void dataGridView1_CellValueNeeded(object sender, DataGridViewCellValueEventArgs e) { e.Value = memoryCache.RetrieveElement(e.RowIndex, e.ColumnIndex); } } }
我測試的是100萬條數據,真的和直接加載一個100萬條數據的DataTable有天壤之別。附一個圖:

